|Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News|Primary Care Pharmacy Model Attractive to Patients1991-2014 Saw Minimal Change in Health Spending Per StateLegalized Pot May Lead to More Traffic CrashesMany Doctors Silent on Cost of Cancer CareGroup Urges Tougher Limits on Chemical in Shampoos, Cosmetics18 Percent Increase Projected in Primary Care Demand by 2023Why Patients Leave the Hospital Against Doctor's OrdersRaise the Smoking Age to 21? Most Kids Fine With ThatComprehensive Audiologic Care Feasible in Free Clinic ModelMany Tanning Salons Defy Legal Age Limits on UsersLifesaving Drugs From Pfizer in Short Supply: FDALeading U.S. Doctors' Group Takes Aim at Rising Drug PricesU.S. Hospitals Still Prescribe Too Many Antibiotics: StudyFDA Puts Brakes on Rule Requiring New 'Nutrition Facts' LabelCardiac Arrest? Someday, Drones May Come to Your RescueSAMHSA: 9.8 Million U.S. Adults Have Serious Mental IllnessFDA Asks Maker of Opioid Painkiller Opana ER to Pull Drug From MarketHealth System Sees Success With E-Visits Via Patient PortalOvercharging Common in U.S. Emergency RoomsAdvocating for a Loved OneHigh Costs for Myeloma Patients Not Getting Low-Income SubsidyGetting Bedbugs Out of Nursing Homes, Apartment Buildings - for GoodCosts of ER Treatments a Mystery to Many DocsNew Bill Intends to Repeal Limits on Physician-Owned HospitalsTechnology Can Help Patients Facing Routine DecisionsKidneys From Deceased Diabetics Might Ease Organ Shortage: StudyElements of a Patient-Centered Hospital Room IdentifiedCan Tracking Germs in One Hospital Make All Hospitals Safer?Chances of Successful CPR Dwindle as Seniors AgeNew FDA Head Outlines 'Forceful Steps' Against Opioid CrisisChecking Patient's Drug History May Help Curb Opioid AbuseAt Major Teaching Hospitals, Lower Death RatesAmericans Skeptical of Corporate-Backed Health ResearchToo Many Americans Still Go Without Cancer ScreeningsBlack, Hispanic Americans Less Likely to See a NeurologistSome Lead Poisoning Tests May Be FaultyYour Doctor's Age Might Affect Your CareMany U.S. Travelers Skip Measles Shots, Despite Infection RiskPatients Satisfied With Telehealth Primary Care VisitsNearly a Third of Drugs Hit by Safety Issues After FDA ApprovalNo Routine Screening for Thyroid Cancer: Expert PanelPAS: Internet Info Can Lower Parent Trust in Doctors' DiagnosisFDA Warns of Tattoo DangersBystander CPR Not Only Saves Lives, It Lessens Disability: StudyMore Starring Roles for Booze in Kids' Movies, Study FindsMental Health Myths Abound in the U.S.Half of U.S. Docs Get Payments From Drug, Device Industries: StudyAMA Urges Doctors to Talk About Safe Opioid Storage, DisposalRoutine Blood Tests Can Harm Patient CareApril 29 Is National Prescription Drug Take Back DayQuestions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Some Lead Poisoning Tests May Be Faulty
by -- Steven Reinberg, Robert Preidt
Updated: May 17th 2017
WEDNESDAY, May 17, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Lead tests made by Magellan Diagnostics may yield inaccurate results for some children and adults, U.S. health officials warned Wednesday.
Parents of children younger than 6 years old, pregnant women and nursing mothers who have been tested for lead exposure using these tests should consult a health care provider about whether they should be retested, the officials said.
Data indicate that when all four of Magellan's lead testing systems -- LeadCare; LeadCare II; LeadCare Plus; and LeadCare Ultra -- are performed on blood drawn from a vein, they may give results that are lower than the actual level of lead in the blood.
However, lead testing using blood taken from a vein is not widespread. Most testing is done with finger pricks and heel pricks, the officials said.
"The FDA is concerned that Magellan lead tests that use blood drawn from a vein may provide results that are lower than the actual level of lead in the blood. There is little evidence that Magellan tests using blood from a finger or heel stick are affected," Dr. Jeffrey Shuren, director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said during a morning media briefing.
Finger pricks are used on most children. Since 2014, about 8 million tests have been performed, with the vast majority based on blood from finger or heel samples. In Flint, Mich., for example, less than 1 percent of children tested for lead had blood samples taken from a vein, the officials said.
Still, Shuren said the FDA is "deeply concerned by this situation and is warning laboratories and health care professionals that they should not use any Magellan Diagnostics' lead tests with blood drawn from a vein."
Shuren added that "the agency is aggressively investigating this complicated issue to determine the cause of the inaccurate results and working with the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and other public health partners to address the problem as quickly as possible."
Patrick Breysse, director of the CDC's National Center for Environmental Health, said, "We understand that parents of children and others affected by this problem will be concerned about what this means for their health.
"While most children likely received an accurate test result, it is important to identify those whose exposure was missed, or underestimated, so that they can receive proper care. For this reason, because every child's health is important, the CDC recommends that those at greatest risk be retested," Breysse said.
Lead exposure can lead to serious health problems, and is particularly dangerous to infants and young children. Recommendations for lead screening differ from state to state, but all states require children to be screened for lead exposure.
Some adults are also at risk for lead exposure, including those who work with products or materials that contain lead, the FDA said.
It's safe to use all LeadCare systems that rely on blood from a finger or heel stick, including the LeadCare II system, which is found in many doctors' offices and clinics, the officials said.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on lead.
This article: Copyright © 2017 HealthDay. All rights reserved.